Wrangler Women's Q-Baby Mid Rise Cowgirl Cut Ultimate Riding Jeans
Item # 350755
Wrangler Women's Q-Baby Mid Rise Cowgirl Cut Ultimate Riding Jeans
Item # 350755
Details
/wrangler-womens-q-baby-mid-rise-cowgirl-cut-ultimate-riding-jeans/350755.html- Wrangler Women's Q-Baby Mid Rise Cowgirl Cut Ultimate Riding Jeans
- Item # 350755
$53.99 Online Price
Additional Information
Additional Product Data
- Video Asset IDs: vid-41
Product Features & Description
Comfort meets beauty with Wrangler Cowgirl Cut Ultimate Riding Jeans in Q-baby Fit .With stretch denim, flat seams for added comfort and a no gap waistband, you'll never ride in another pair of jeans. And with a slimming, stylish cut, you're sure to make even the toughest cowboys feel a bit weak in the knees.
Style(s): WRQ20BL, WRQ20DD,WRQ20TB, WRQ20WS
- Perfect rise for riding
- Five pocket styling
- Decorative Wrangler "W" on the back pockets
- Rivet trim
- No gap waistband
- Mid rise
- Boot cut
- 9 3/8" Waist rise in front, 14 3/4" waist rise in back
Product Reviews
Wrangler Women's Q-Baby Mid Rise Cowgirl Cut Ultimate Riding Jeans is rated
out of
5 by
175.
Rated 1 out of
5
by
csten from
NOT THE SAME Q Baby WRQ20TB AS BEFORE
I recently bought 3 pairs of these (not directly from Wrangler) but the same model number. Have been wearing these for years. The new ones are not the same. They are huge in the leg, they use to fit snug down past the knee they now loose the thigh and ver baggy in the knee also a 36" inseam is more like 38".. TB color was super dark blue with tons of dye still coming out after 3 hot water washes. My bad for just tossing them in the wash and not trying them on. Now have 3 pairs of new jeans I won't wear. Not happy Wrangler changed the fit but kept the model number the same. It is not just me a friend also got 3 pair and hers are also the same.
Date published: 2017-04-18
Rated 5 out of
5
by
tia35 from
LOVE LOVE LOVE these jeans!
Im 5'9 tall and with a 36 inseam it is REALLY hard to find jeans that fit well and do not get saggy in the zipper as the day goes on. I Judge as well as ride, so at times I need a great pair of jeans to "go casual" with a blazer. I went with the "Absolute star", I love that the pockets have a little bling but are not over done. These perfect jeans hold in the perfect places, and do not get bunchy in the waist under my belt. In the past I purchased the wrangler "aura" jeans but these are a smoken hot upgrade! Worth the extra money, fit perfect to size and love the little streach!
Date published: 2012-11-17
Rated 5 out of
5
by
Silatiger from
Excellent Fit and Hard Working Durability!
I bought these jeans for work at a camel ranch in Germany, and let me say that I was surprised when they well exceeded my expectations. The fit was insanely good (my waist is a full 12 inches smaller than my hips, so believe me when I say I'm not an easy fit!), they are comfortable and allow a full range of motion, even when down on the ground or crouching, and they take a beating and washing and keep right on going. After months of almost daily wear and washing, mine are only just starting to show some wear, and I can't recommend them enough. They're hard working, look good and fit well.
Date published: 2016-09-16
Rated 3 out of
5
by
M. from
Loved the color and fabric; hated the fit.
I ordered these jeans because I wanted tan, boot-cut jeans. I did not buy them for riding, and that might have been the problem. The color and the fabric were just what I wanted but the fit wasn't. They were VERY baggy through the hips and thighs. That might be comfortable for riding horses but it is very unattractive for everyday wear. (The picture online was misleading; it made these jeans look much trimmer. Not skin-tight, but trim.) Also, they were a good 3-4 inches too long, even though I used the online fit guide and ordered the recommended size. Sadly, I will have to return these jeans. Too bad because Wrangler is the only company I could find that offers tan boot-cut jeans. Maybe they could offer the tan color in one of their trimmer fitting jeans?
Date published: 2016-10-16